Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II

Autor/inn/en	Robitschek, Christine; Ashton, Matthew W.; Spering, Cynthia C.; Geiger, Nathaniel; Byers, Danielle; Schotts, G. Christian; Thoen, Megan A.
Titel	Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II
Quelle	In: Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59 (2012) 2, S.274-287 (14 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0167
DOI	10.1037/a0027310
Schlagwörter	Evidence; Undergraduate Students; Intervals; Test Validity; Factor Structure; Measures (Individuals); Factor Analysis; Psychometrics; Behavior Patterns; Psychology; Higher Education; Counseling + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Evidenz; Testvalidität; Faktorenstruktur; Messdaten; Faktorenanalyse; Psychometry; Psychometrie; Psychologie; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Counselling; Beratung
Abstract	The original Personal Growth Initiative Scale (PGIS; Robitschek, 1998) was unidimensional, despite theory identifying multiple components (e.g., cognition and behavior) of personal growth initiative (PGI). The present research developed a multidimensional measure of the complex process of PGI, while retaining the brief and psychometrically sound properties of the original scale. Study 1 focused on scale development, including theoretical derivation of items, assessing factor structure, reducing number of items, and refining the scale length using samples of college students. Study 2 consisted of confirmatory factor analysis with 3 independent samples of college students and community members. Lastly, Study 3 assessed test-retest reliability over 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-week periods and tests of concurrent and discriminant validity using samples of college students. The final measure, the Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II (PGIS-II), includes 4 subscales: Readiness for Change, Planfulness, Using Resources, and Intentional Behavior. These studies provide exploratory and confirmatory evidence for the 4-factor structure, strong internal consistency for the subscales and overall score across samples, acceptable temporal stability at all assessed intervals, and concurrent and discriminant validity of the PGIS-II. Future directions for research and clinical practice are discussed. (Contains 1 footnote, 4 tables, and 2 figures.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10