Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enHowell, William; Peterson, Paul E.; West, Martin
TitelThe Public Weighs in on School Reform: Intense Controversies Do Not Alter Public Thinking, but Teachers Differ More Sharply than Ever
QuelleIn: Education Next, 11 (2011) 4, S.10-22 (13 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1539-9664
SchlagwörterStellungnahme; Electronic Learning; Public Schools; Opinions; Online Courses; Educational Change; Teacher Attitudes; Educational Vouchers; Surveys; Public Opinion; Public Education; Teachers; Teacher Rights; Unions; Tenure; Merit Pay; Comparative Analysis
AbstractIn this article, the authors explore the following questions: How have Americans actually responded to these developments? Have they grown more supportive of the current direction of school reform, or are there instead signs of a backlash? And how do the views of teachers compare to those of the public at large? In addition to the views of the public as a whole, the authors pay special attention in this survey to two potentially influential types of participants in school politics: the affluent and teachers. Their findings reveal more stability than change in public opinion over the five years since the "Education Next"-PEPG survey began, suggesting that the momentous policy developments of the past year were not caused by--nor have they yet produced--broad changes in popular views. The one exception to that generalization is a significant turnaround in support for school vouchers, which until this year had been in decline. The views of the affluent resemble those of the general public, except that the affluent are more likely to hold strong opinions and even larger percentages support the positions taken by a plurality of the general public. However, the well-to-do are more skeptical of online learning. They also hold the public schools in their own community in comparatively high regard, perhaps because they have better access to good public schools. Teacher opinion often diverges from that of both the affluent and the general public. (Contains 8 figures.) (ERIC).
AnmerkungenHoover Institution. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6010. Tel: 800-935-2882; Fax: 650-723-8626; e-mail: educationnext@hoover.stanford.edu; Web site: http://educationnext.org/journal/
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Education Next" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: