Response to Oud & Folmer: Randomness and Residuals

Autor/inn/en	Steele, Joel S.; Ferrer, Emilio
Titel	Response to Oud & Folmer: Randomness and Residuals
Quelle	In: Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46 (2011) 6, S.994-1003 (10 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0027-3171
DOI	10.1080/00273171.2011.625308
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Calculus; Responses; Simulation; Models; Structural Equation Models; Error of Measurement; Statistics; Maximum Likelihood Statistics; Equations (Mathematics); Computation; Mathematical Models + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Analysis; Differenzialrechnung; Infinitesimalrechnung; Integralrechnung; Simulation program; Simulationsprogramm; Analogiemodell; Messfehler; Statistik; Equations; Mathematics; Gleichungslehre; Mathematical model; Mathematisches Modell
Abstract	This article presents our response to Oud and Folmer's "Modeling Oscillation, Approximately or Exactly?" (2011), which criticizes aspects of our article, "Latent Differential Equation Modeling of Self-Regulatory and Coregulatory Affective Processes" (2011). In this response, we present a conceptual explanation of the derivative-based estimation that we implemented in our original article, as well as the exact discrete model promoted by Oud & Folmer. We describe relevant differences between each of the two methods, highlight some of their benefits and limitations, and offer justifications for our choice. (Contains 1 figure and 1 footnote.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Psychology Press. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10