Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Scully, Maura King |
---|---|
Titel | Are We There Yet? |
Quelle | In: CURRENTS, 36 (2010) 1, S.16-21 (6 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0748-478X |
Schlagwörter | Feedback (Response); Alumni; Marketing; Benchmarking; Higher Education; Surveys; Budgets; Foreign Countries; Comparative Analysis; Australia; Canada; United Kingdom |
Abstract | How things have changed. No longer can alumni relations rely on head counts or anecdotal feedback as indicators of a job well done. Alumni leaders now have to prove it, and to do that, they need to look at their programs with a critical eye, comparing where they stack up against peer and aspirant institutions on specific, measurable objectives. In other words, alumni relations professionals need to benchmark. Benchmarking in alumni relations isn't exactly new; it's been around at least since 1985, when CASE released one of its first publications on program self-assessment, "Criteria for Evaluating Advancement Programs". "Benchmarking" is actually a statistical term. It's when one's score is referred to normative data--to look at where one is on the bell curve. Benchmarking involves identifying common areas of interest, collecting data on performance, setting goals on how one is going to improve, and then checking in annually to see how one has progressed. In this respect, benchmarking is a comprehensive process, not simply sending out a survey or conducting market research or setting goals (though it may involve all three). In this article, the author presents the top 10 reasons to benchmark. (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Council for Advancement and Support of Education. 1307 New York Avenue NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. Tel: 202-328-2273; e-mail: memberservicecenter@case.org; Web site: http://www.case.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |