Can the Interactive Whiteboard Support Young Children's Collaborative Communication and Thinking in Classroom Science Activities?

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

Trefferliste

Autor/inn/en	Kershner, Ruth; Mercer, Neil; Warwick, Paul; Kleine Staarman, Judith
Titel	Can the Interactive Whiteboard Support Young Children's Collaborative Communication and Thinking in Classroom Science Activities?
Quelle	In: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5 (2010) 4, S.359-383 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1556-1607
DOI	10.1007/s11412-010-9096-2
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Science Activities; Group Activities; Educational Resources; Elementary School Students; Science Instruction; Classroom Techniques; Inservice Teacher Education; Learning Processes; Instructional Effectiveness; Visual Aids; Computer Assisted Instruction; Computer Mediated Communication; Technology Integration; Classroom Communication; Cooperative Learning; Interviews; Observation; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Gruppenaktivität; Bildungsmittel; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Klassenführung; Lehrerfortbildung; Learning process; Lernprozess; Unterrichtserfolg; Anschauungsmaterial; Computer based training; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; Computerkonferenz; Klassengespräch; Kooperatives Lernen; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Beobachtung
Abstract	Interactive whiteboards (IWBs) have been widely introduced to English primary schools (5-11 years) in the last decade and this has generated much research interest. In the past, research has focused on IWB-use in teacher-led sessions, attending particularly to the nature of teacher-pupil interaction at the IWB and the apparent motivational advantages for children. In contrast, this study focuses on children's communication and thinking during their semi-autonomous use of the IWB during collaborative groupwork in primary school science lessons, aiming in part to see if the IWB is suited to this type of use. Over the course of one school year, twelve primary teachers of Years 4 and 5 (8-10 years) took part in a professional development and research programme which involved them in devising a sequence of three science lessons incorporating small-group activity at the IWB. The functionality of the IWB is analysed here as means for supporting the children's joint communication and thinking, using embedded cues and the availability of certain features in the IWB technology. Our observational analysis of two examples of children's collaborative activity in different classrooms, together with subsequent group interviews, suggests that the IWB can make some identifiable contributions to children's productive communication and thinking. However the IWB is not seen to be an entirely distinctive or pedagogically transformative learning resource in the primary classroom. In our developing conceptual framework, the children's knowledge building is closely related to their active engagement in using IWB affordances and their productive dialogue, essentially supported by the teacher's scaffolding strategies, the establishment and use of "talk rules" in conversation, and the opportunities and constraints applying in classroom participation structures. These conditions help the children to deal with interconnected social, cognitive, and technical problems arising over time. Certain aspects of this form of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) are discussed. These relate to the integration of the IWB with other classroom learning systems and resources, and to the nature of progression in children's activity and learning with this new type of highly integrated system of CSCL. (Contains 3 figures and 1 table.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10