Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Zehr, Mary Ann |
---|---|
Titel | Researchers: ELL Surveys Are Flawed |
Quelle | In: Education Week, 30 (2010) 1, S.1 (2 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0277-4232 |
Schlagwörter | Federal Legislation; Validity; Federal Government; Politics of Education; Researchers; Grants; English (Second Language); Surveys; Higher Education; Evaluation; Elementary Secondary Education; Arizona; California; New York Bundesrecht; Gültigkeit; Bundesregierung; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Researcher; Forscher; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Evaluierung; Kalifornien |
Abstract | The author reports on a review of state policies by researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, which raises questions about the validity of the use of home-language surveys as a step to identify students eligible for special help in learning English. While it's ubiquitous in schools across the country, the practice of educators' giving a home-language survey to parents or students who are believed to speak a language other than English at home is not mandated by the federal government. Federal law does, however, require that states somehow identify students who need extra services to learn English, and many schools use such a survey to find out whether children's English skills should be tested. In their study, conducted with a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Alison L. Bailey, a professor of education for UCLA, and Kimberly R. Kelly, a doctoral student in education at the university, spell out how home-language surveys can both underidentify and overidentify students who need support to learn English. The study was published as a "white paper" by "Evaluating the Validity of English-Language-Proficiency Assessments", or EVEA, the partnership that got the study grant. The wording of questions on the surveys and how the questionnaires are carried out vary so much among states, and the validity of the information gathered from them is so unproved, that the researchers suggest it might be best for home-language surveys to be abandoned. (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Editorial Projects in Education. 6935 Arlington Road Suite 100, Bethesda, MD 20814-5233. Tel: 800-346-1834; Tel: 301-280-3100; e-mail: customercare@epe.org; Web site: http://www.edweek.org/info/about/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |