Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Harmon, Corinne |
---|---|
Titel | Beyond "Cain v. Horne": Comment on Tim Keller's "The National Implications of 'Cain v. Horne'" |
Quelle | In: Journal of School Choice, 4 (2010) 2, S.236-241 (6 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1558-2159 |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Disabilities; Educational Vouchers; Special Needs Students; Federal Legislation; Reader Response; Childrens Rights; Court Litigation; Criticism; Accessibility (for Disabled); School Choice; Educational Policy; Special Education; Arizona Handicap; Behinderung; Educational voucher; Bildungsgutschein; Sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarf; Bundesrecht; Leserbrief; 'Children''s rights'; Kindesrecht; Rechtsstreit; Kritik; Accessibility; Zugänglichkeit; Choice of school; Schulwahl; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Special needs education; Sonderpädagogik; Sonderschulwesen |
Abstract | This commentary is in response to Tim Keller's article "The National Implications of 'Cain v. Horne.'" In his analysis, Keller asserts that the Arizona Supreme Court wrongfully struck down a voucher program for students with special needs by characterizing the voucher as aid to schools rather than aid to students. In this response to Keller, I discuss why his assessment is incorrect. I also address the broader issue of a child's rights according to the Individuals with Disabilities Act and how those rights are essentially lost when parents choose a private school for their children, a result states should not facilitate with public money in the form of a voucher. (Contains 1 note.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |