Scratching beneath the Surface of Communities of (Mal)practice

Autor/inn/en	Pemberton, Jon; Mavin, Sharon; Stalker, Brenda
Titel	Scratching beneath the Surface of Communities of (Mal)practice
Quelle	In: Learning Organization, 14 (2007) 1, S.62-73 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0969-6474
DOI	10.1108/09696470710718357
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Political Issues; Politics of Education; Researchers; Communities of Practice; Failure; Knowledge Management; Shared Resources and Services; Higher Education; Work Environment; Power Structure; Organizational Development; Industrial Psychology; Organizational Climate; Quality of Working Life; Social Psychology; United Kingdom + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Politischer Faktor; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Researcher; Forscher; Community; Wissensmanagement; Gemeinwirtschaft; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Arbeitsmilieu; Organisationsentwicklung; Betriebspsychologie; Industriepsychologie; Organisationsklima; Arbeitsqualität; Sozialpsychologie; Großbritannien
Abstract	Purpose: This paper seeks to surface less positive aspects of communities of practice (CoPs), regardless of emergent or organisationally managed, grounded in political-power interactions. Examples are provided from the authors' experiences of a research-based CoP within UK higher education. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is primarily theoretical with empirical examples drawn from a descriptive CoP case study. Findings: The paper discusses the following themes: the impact of timing on CoP development; the impact of CoP leaders and managers in "managed" CoPs; the power-political interrelationship between emergent CoPs and formal organisation; the impact of dominant actors with position power; emotional containment and emotion work within CoPs; power implications of novices and masters and the implications when CoP practices diverge from organisational practices. It finds that to ignore such issues of power within CoPs is to limit the knowledge creation process. Research limitations/implications: Further empirical research is necessary to investigate micro and macro power-political issues of CoPs. In particular, emotional containment and emotion work of CoP members and the impact of this on knowledge creation is worthy of future research. Practical implications: The paper has significant implications for CoPs in practice as the quest for pragmatic mechanisms to develop individual and organisational learning and knowledge creation for competitive advantage. Originality/value: While there is an implicit assumption that CoPs are "good" and benefit individuals and organisations, this paper highlights less positive power-political issues relating to CoPs which are under researched in the extant literature. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Emerald. 875 Massachusetts Avenue 7th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139. Tel: 888-622-0075; Fax: 617-354-6875; e-mail: america@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emeraldinsight.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10