Knowledge Theories Can Inform Evaluation Practice: What Can a Complexity Lens Add?

Autor/inn/en	Hawe, Penelope; Bond, Lyndal; Butler, Helen
Titel	Knowledge Theories Can Inform Evaluation Practice: What Can a Complexity Lens Add?
Quelle	In: New Directions for Evaluation, (2009) 124, S.89-100 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1097-6736
Schlagwörter	Evaluation Methods; Program Evaluation; Theories; Intervention; Evaluators; Educational Change; Foreign Countries; Australia; Canada + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Theory; Theorie; Bildungsreform; Ausland; Australien; Kanada
Abstract	Programs and policies invariably contain new knowledge. Theories about knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and knowledge translation theories illuminate some mechanisms of change processes. But more often than not, when it comes to understanding patterns about change processes, "the foreground" is privileged more than "the background". The foreground is the knowledge or technology tied up with the product or program that prompted the evaluation. The background is the ongoing dynamics of the context into which the knowledge is inserted. Complex adaptive system thinking encourages greater attention to this context and the interactions and consequences that result from the intervention, making these the forefront of attention. For the evaluator, there are implications of this shift in thinking. Process evaluations should be designed to capture the fluidity of the change process. Impact and outcome evaluations will require long time frames. Complex adaptive system thinking also encourages multilevel measures, a focus on structures, and capacity to assess the possibility of whole system transformation (whole school, whole organization) as a result of the newly introduced program or policy. For the people involved in the innovation, there is a corresponding shift from a focus on their knowledge (and competence) to assessment of their learning (and system-level capability). New ways to interpret fidelity in these situations should therefore be developed. (Contains 2 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Jossey-Bass. Available from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10