Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | McDermott, Kathleen B.; Szpunar, Karl K.; Christ, Shawn E. |
---|---|
Titel | Laboratory-Based and Autobiographical Retrieval Tasks Differ Substantially in Their Neural Substrates |
Quelle | In: Neuropsychologia, 47 (2009) 11, S.2290-2298 (9 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0028-3932 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.025 |
Schlagwörter | Maps; Laboratory Experiments; Recognition (Psychology); Brain Hemisphere Functions; Research Methodology; Biographies; Cues; Meta Analysis; Task Analysis; Comparative Analysis |
Abstract | In designing experiments to investigate retrieval of event memory, researchers choose between utilizing laboratory-based methods (in which to-be-remembered materials are presented to participants) and autobiographical approaches (in which the to-be-remembered materials are events from the participant's pre-experimental life). In practice, most laboratory studies have utilized old/new recognition memory, and most autobiographical memory studies have used the Galton-Crovitz word cueing technique [Crovitz, H.F., & Schiffman, H. (1974). "Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age." "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society," 4, 517-518]. What are the implications of these methodological choices for understanding the component processes and underlying neural substrates of memory retrieval? An Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis procedure [Turkeltaub, P., Eden, G., Jones, K., & Zeffiro, TA. (2002). "Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation." "NeuroImage," 16, 765-780] was used to construct two whole-brain statistical maps: one showing brain regions that are consistently implicated when the task utilized is old/new recognition memory and one showing regions that tend to emerge when autobiographical event memory is queried. A comparison of the two maps shows very few regions of overlap. This basic methodological choice has a profound impact on the conclusions reached regarding human memory retrieval and its neural substrates. (Contains 4 figures and 2 tables.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |