Are Australian Universities Promoting Learning and Teaching Activity Effectively? An Assessment of the Effects on Science and Engineering Academics

Autor/in	Cretchley, Patricia
Titel	Are Australian Universities Promoting Learning and Teaching Activity Effectively? An Assessment of the Effects on Science and Engineering Academics
Quelle	In: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40 (2009) 7, S.865-875 (11 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0020-739X
Schlagwörter	Role Models; Awards; Job Satisfaction; Engineering; Federal Government; Rewards; Employment Opportunities; Grants; Leadership; College Faculty; Foreign Countries; Teaching Methods; Teacher Attitudes; Learning; Australia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Identifikationsfigur; Award; Auszeichnung; Labor; Labour; Satisfaction; Arbeit; Zufriedenheit; Maschinenbau; Bundesregierung; Reward; Belohnung; Berufschance; Beschäftigungschance; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Führung; Führungsposition; Fakultät; Ausland; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Lehrerverhalten; Lernen; Australien
Abstract	The Australian Federal Government and Australian universities have embarked on a bid to raise the profile of learning and teaching (L&T) in universities. Current strategies include increased funding of competitive grants for L&T projects, a wider range of teaching awards and fellowships and a controversial new national competitive Learning and Teaching Performance Fund. Despite these initiatives, advertised positions still target strong researchers, rather, and rewards for L&T initiatives are meagre. To assess the likely impact of these efforts, this report offers findings on the L&T culture among two distinct groups of Australian science, technology and engineering academics: a comparison of the research and L&T behaviours and attitudes of 22 senior academics, and the L&T perceptions and needs reported by 32 academics across all levels. The results are unequivocal: (1) senior academics still perceive that there are far higher professional rewards for research activities than for L&T activity, place far higher value on research leadership roles than L&T leadership, and gain far more job satisfaction from research activities. Moreover, they feel that their seniors support and encourage them far more strongly for research efforts than for L&T efforts; (2) academics at all levels still experience a lack of role models, support and reward for L&T activities; and resent L&T policies that neglect discipline-specific needs. The implications are clear. Unless rewards and support for L&T activities become comparable to those for research, and mainstream job opportunities materialize for academics who invest substantial time in L&T activities, national and institutional rhetoric strategies to encourage L&T activity will continue to be judged as window-dressing and be received with cynicism; and changes in academic behaviour will be marginal. (Contains 3 figures.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10