Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Schulz, E. Matthew |
|---|---|
| Titel | Commentary: A Response to Reckase's Conceptual Framework and Examples for Evaluating Standard Setting Methods |
| Quelle | In: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25 (2006) 3, S.4-13 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 0731-1745 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00061.x |
| Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Psychometrics; Group Behavior; Standard Setting; Simulation; Reader Response; Misconceptions; Criticism; Concept Mapping; Evaluation; Review (Reexamination) |
| Abstract | A look at real data shows that Reckase's psychometric theory for standard setting is not applicable to bookmark and that his simulations cannot explain actual differences between methods. It is suggested that exclusively test-centered, criterion-referenced approaches are too idealized and that a psychophysics paradigm and a theory of group behavior could be more useful in thinking about the standard setting process. In this view, item mapping methods such as bookmark are reasonable adaptations to fundamental limitations in human judgments of item difficulty. They make item ratings unnecessary and have unique potential for integrating external validity data and student performance data more fully into the standard setting process. (Author). |
| Anmerkungen | Blackwell Publishing. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8599; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: customerservices@blackwellpublishing.com; Web site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnl_default.asp |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2017/4/10 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
