Why So Little Faith? A Reply to Blanton and Jaccard's (2006) Skeptical View of Testing Pure Multiplicative Theories: Postscript

Autor/inn/en	Greenwald, Anthony G.; Rudman, Laurie A.; Nosek, Brian A.; Zayas, Vivian
Titel	Why So Little Faith? A Reply to Blanton and Jaccard's (2006) Skeptical View of Testing Pure Multiplicative Theories: Postscript
Quelle	In: Psychological Review, 113 (2006) 1, S.180 (1 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0033-295X
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Hypothesis Testing; Theories; Persuasive Discourse; Criticism; Psychological Studies + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hypothesenprüfung; Hypothesentest; Theory; Theorie; Persuasion; Persuasive Kommunikation; Kritik
Abstract	Blanton and Jaccard drafted a Postscript in response to our Reply. Their Postscript has two types of arguments: (a) repetitions of statements made previously in their article and already addressed in our Reply (thus needing no further comment here) and (b) regrettably, responses to arguments that they themselves constructed and attributed to us. The latter type need no comment beyond pointing them out and documenting that they are indeed misstatements. To do this thoroughly, we created a table that includes the misstatements, together with quotations of what we actually said. The table amplifies the brief comments that appear after each of the five misstatements that are listed in this article. (Author).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10