In One's Own Image: Ethics and the Reproduction of Deafness

Autor/in	Johnston, Trevor
Titel	In One's Own Image: Ethics and the Reproduction of Deafness
Quelle	In: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (2005) 4, S.426-441 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1081-4159
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Ethics; Deafness; Genetics; Birth + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ethik; Gehörlosigkeit; Taubstummheit; Humangenetik; Geburt
Abstract	The ethics of the use of genetic screening and reproductive technologies to select against and for deafness is presented. It is argued that insofar as deafness is a disability it is ethical to act in such a way as to avoid the conception or birth of children with genetic or congenital deafness. The discovery and recognition of signing deaf communities as cultural and linguistic communities (minorities) does not alter this basic ethical position, although the consequences of widespread application of this technology appears destined to lead to the eventual disappearance of these communities. The argument that acting to avoid deafness is unethical because it will lead to the elimination of a linguistic or cultural group (genocide or ethnocide) or conversely that acting to ensure deafness is ethical, if not praiseworthy, can only be sustained if deafness is not regarded as a disability at all. I argue that the premise that deafness is not a disability of some sort is false and thus the claim that genetic selection against deafness is unethical is untenable. (Contains 5 notes.) (Author).
Anmerkungen	Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP UK. Tel: +44 1865-353907; Fax: +44 1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/.
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10