Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Naigles, Letitia R. |
---|---|
Titel | Paradox Lost? No, Paradox Found! Reply to Tomasello and Akhtar (2003). |
Quelle | In: Cognition, 88 (2003) 3, S.325-29Infoseite zur Zeitschrift |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0010-0277 |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; Child Language; Cognitive Development; Comprehension; Developmental Stages; Early Experience; Expressive Language; Infants; Language Acquisition; Performance Factors; Syntax; Toddlers |
Abstract | Asserts that the posited paradox between infancy and toddlerhood language was not eliminated by Tomasello and Akhtar's appeal to infants' robust statistical learning abilities. Maintains that scrutiny of their studies supports the resolution that abstracting linguistic form is easy for infants and that toddlers find it difficult to integrate abstract forms with meaning. Claims that intermodal preferential looking studies demonstrate that toddlers can distinguish transitive and intratransitive frames. (KB) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |