Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Stanic, George M. A.; Russell, Dee |
---|---|
Titel | Continuity in "How We Think." |
Quelle | In: Teachers College Record, 104 (2002) 6, S.1229-63Infoseite zur Zeitschrift |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0161-4681 |
Schlagwörter | Rezension; Educational Philosophy; Educational Theories; Elementary Secondary Education; Ethics; Teacher Role |
Abstract | Notes that Prawat claimed that Dewey was indebted to Peirce, that Dewey never gave Peirce the credit he deserved, and that Dewey's acceptance of Peirce's ideas in 1915 represented a discontinuity in Dewey's thinking. This paper concludes that a comparison of two versions of Dewey's "How We Think" (1910 and 1933) does not provide the support Prawat claims is there to substantiate his claim of discontinuity. (SM) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |