Investigating Student Reasoning about Measurement Uncertainty and Ability to Draw Conclusions from Measurement Data in Inquiry-Based University Physics Labs

Autor/in	Wan, Tong
Titel	Investigating Student Reasoning about Measurement Uncertainty and Ability to Draw Conclusions from Measurement Data in Inquiry-Based University Physics Labs
Quelle	In: International Journal of Science Education, 45 (2023) 3, S.223-243 (21 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Wan, Tong)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0950-0693
DOI	10.1080/09500693.2022.2156824
Schlagwörter	Measurement; Physics; College Science; Science Laboratories; Science Instruction; College Students; Science Experiments; Inquiry; Logical Thinking; Ambiguity (Context); Data Analysis + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Messverfahren; Physik; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Collegestudent; Auswertung
Abstract	Measurement uncertainty is a key topic in the university physics laboratory curriculum. In this study, we investigate students' ability to draw conclusions from measurement data and reasoning about measurement uncertainty in inquiry labs. This investigation centres around a task where students conclude whether measurements from two experiments that differ only by one setup agree or disagree. Surveys were administered in introductory physics courses before and after "Workshop Physics" instruction, which utilises an activity-based, guided-inquiry approach. Student reasoning was characterised using the point and set paradigms. Think-aloud interviews were conducted to gain deeper insights into students' interpretations of measurement uncertainty. The survey results showed that students tended to draw conclusions based on the means without appropriately accounting for uncertainty even if many recognised the need to evaluate uncertainty. The number of decimal places had no influence on students' ability to draw conclusions. After instruction, students' reasoning shifted from point toward set or mixed paradigm, but their ability to draw conclusions did not improve. During the interviews, students demonstrated sophisticated interpretations about measurement uncertainty and data analysis strategies they used. Students recognised measurement uncertainty is inevitable and were able to identify possible sources of uncertainty. We discuss implications for instruction around measurement uncertainty. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01