Japanese Version of the Personal Outcomes Scale for Persons with Intellectual Disability: Validity and Reliability

Autor/inn/en	Tatsuta, Mizuho; Kawai, Norimune; Ushiyama, Michio; Lombardi, Marco
Titel	Japanese Version of the Personal Outcomes Scale for Persons with Intellectual Disability: Validity and Reliability
Quelle	In: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 48 (2023) 1, S.23-39 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Tatsuta, Mizuho) ORCID (Kawai, Norimune) ORCID (Ushiyama, Michio) ORCID (Lombardi, Marco)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1366-8250
DOI	10.3109/13668250.2022.2086109
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Quality of Life; Intellectual Disability; Test Validity; Test Reliability; Cultural Relevance; Adults; Individual Characteristics; Individual Development; Self Determination; Interpersonal Relationship; Inclusion; Civil Rights; Well Being; Japan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Lebensqualität; Intellect; Disability; Disabilities; Verstand; Behinderung; Testvalidität; Testreliabilität; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Individuelle Entwicklung; Selbstbestimmung; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Inklusion; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; Well-being; Wellness; Wohlbefinden
Abstract	Background: The Personal Outcomes Scale is a measurement tool to examine quality of life among persons with intellectual disability. This paper addressed the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the scale using both self-reports and reports of others. Method: Data were collected from 128 people with intellectual disability (90 men and 38 women; M[subscript age] = 37.19 ± 11.90 (range = 19-69) years) and 27 support workers. Reliability was examined by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, inter-respondent reliability coefficients, and test-retest reliability. Validity was examined by construct validity and criteria-related validity. Results: Self- and other-reported versions showed adequate internal consistency ([alpha] = 0.79); however, some domains had relatively low internal consistency. Validity tests showed weak to moderate correlations between the total score and the domain scores in both versions. Conclusions: The scale is reliable overall; however, cultural aspects should be considered to bolster its reliability for practical application. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01