Current Services and Outcomes of Formerly Institutionalised and Never-Institutionalised US Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Stancliffe, Roger J.; Tichá, Renáta; Pettingell, Sandra L.; Houseworth, James; Bershadsky, Julie
Titel	Current Services and Outcomes of Formerly Institutionalised and Never-Institutionalised US Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36 (2023) 4, S.859-870 (12 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Stancliffe, Roger J.) ORCID (Tichá, Renáta) ORCID (Pettingell, Sandra L.) ORCID (Houseworth, James)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1360-2322
DOI	10.1111/jar.13103
Schlagwörter	Adults; Intellectual Disability; Developmental Disabilities; Facilities; Institutionalized Persons; Institutions; Residential Institutions; Individual Characteristics; Group Homes; Place of Residence; Psychological Patterns; Services; Interpersonal Relationship; Disadvantaged; Personal Autonomy + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Intellect; Disability; Disabilities; Verstand; Behinderung; Entwicklungsstörung; Wohnumgebung; Personality characteristic; Personality traits; Persönlichkeitsmerkmal; Gruppenheim; Wohnort; Dienstleistung; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Individuelle Autonomie
Abstract	Background: Deinstitutionalization research shows better services and outcomes relative to institutional life but has not compared formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised service users. Methods: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised participants on six personal characteristics. Data came from the 2018 to 2019 National Core Indicators In-Person Survey. We excluded current institution residents, and states with 25% + of missing data on former institutionalisation. Results: Overall, 15.5% of participants in the 29-state full sample had lived in an institution for 1 year or more. Findings from the PSM sample showed that former-institution residents were more likely to use congregate living arrangements and less likely to live with family. They experienced more loneliness, less support-related choice, and had a consistent pattern of disability service-focused social connections. Conclusions: Many former institution residents remain disadvantaged relative to matched peers. There is a need to identify factors to enhance services and outcomes following deinstitutionalization. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01