The Role of 'Non-Knowledge' in Crisis Policymaking: A Proposal and Agenda for Future Research

Autor/inn/en	Hannah, Adam; Tchilingirian, Jordan; Botterill, Linda; Attwell, Katie
Titel	The Role of 'Non-Knowledge' in Crisis Policymaking: A Proposal and Agenda for Future Research
Quelle	In: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 19 (2023) 1, S.116-130 (15 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1744-2648
Schlagwörter	Knowledge Level; Epistemology; Comprehension; Misconceptions; Social Problems; Crisis Management; Public Policy; Responses; Evidence Based Practice; Memory; COVID-19; Pandemics; Foreign Countries; Australia + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Wissensbasis; Erkenntnistheorie; Verstehen; Verständnis; Missverständnis; Social problem; Soziales Problem; Krisenmanagement; Öffentliche Ordnung; Gedächtnis; Ausland; Australien
Abstract	Background: Recent complex and cross-boundary policy problems, such as climate change, pandemics, and financial crises, have recentred debates about state capacity, democratic discontent and the 'crisis of expertise'. These problems are contested and open to redefinition, misunderstanding, spin, and deception, challenging the ability of policymakers to locate, discriminate, comprehend, and respond to competing sources of knowledge and expertise. We argue that 'non-knowledge' is an under-explored aspect of responses to major policy crises. Key points: While discussed in recent work in sociology and other social sciences, non-knowledge has been given less explicit attention in policy studies, and is not fully captured by orthodox understandings of knowledge and evidence use. We outline three main forms of non-knowledge that challenge public agencies: amnesia, ignorance and misinformation. In each case, 'non-knowledge' is not simply the absence of policy-relevant knowledge. Amnesia refers to what is forgotten, reinvented or 'unlearned', while claims of ignorance involve obscuring or casting aside of relevant knowledge that could (or even should) be available. To be misinformed is to actively believe false or misleading information. In each instance, non-knowledge may have strategic value for policy actors or aid the pursuit of self-interest. Conclusions and implications: We demonstrate the relevance of non-knowledge through a brief case study, emerging from the inquiry into the COVID-19 hotel quarantine programme in the Australian state of Victoria. We argue that both amnesia and 'practical' forms of ignorance contributed to failures during the early part of the programme. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Policy Press, an imprint of Bristol University Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01