Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Gorges, Julia; Weidner, Enya M. |
---|---|
Titel | Motivation toward Novel Learning Content: Testing the Predictive Validity of School-Based Motivation |
Quelle | In: Journal of Experimental Education, 91 (2023) 1, S.186-204 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Gorges, Julia) ORCID (Weidner, Enya M.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0022-0973 |
DOI | 10.1080/00220973.2021.1897775 |
Schlagwörter | Prediction; Validity; Academic Education; Intellectual Disciplines; Novelty (Stimulus Dimension); Learning Motivation; Self Concept; Academic Ability; College Students; Foreign Countries; Germany |
Abstract | This study investigated the predictive validity of school-subject-specific self-concepts of ability, intrinsic task values, and cost (operationalized as task effort) for motivation regarding unclassified novel learning content--a fictional project management course--as a function of perceived similarity between school subject and novel learning content. Using an experimental survey design, perceived similarity was induced by presenting a description of the project management course that had some similarity to either mathematics or German (i.e., the school subject). Participants (N = 582) were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (i.e., course description hinting at mathematical versus German-related content). Results from multiple-group structural equation modeling demonstrated that individuals' mathematics-specific self-concept of ability and intrinsic task value predicted their course-specific motivational beliefs only when the course description emphasized mathematical content. Facing mathematical course content, predictive validity of individuals' mathematics-specific self-concept of ability and intrinsic task value, respectively, was higher than their German-specific self-concept of ability and intrinsic task value. Findings regarding cost were less consistent. Results are discussed with regard to expectancy-value theory and task choice in higher and further education. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |