Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enLucas, Lyrica; Helikar, Tomáš; Dauer, Joseph
TitelRevision as an Essential Step in Modeling to Support Predicting, Observing, and Explaining Cellular Respiration System Dynamics
QuelleIn: International Journal of Science Education, 44 (2022) 13, S.2152-2179 (28 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
ZusatzinformationORCID (Lucas, Lyrica)
ORCID (Helikar, Tomáš)
ORCID (Dauer, Joseph)
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN0950-0693
DOI10.1080/09500693.2022.2114815
SchlagwörterCytology; Science Instruction; Teaching Methods; Biology; Psychological Patterns; Student Attitudes; Prediction; Instructional Effectiveness; Computer Assisted Instruction; Pretests Posttests; Scientific Concepts; Concept Formation; Undergraduate Students; Classification; Cognitive Processes; Learning Processes; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Student Characteristics; Gender Differences; Ethnicity; First Generation College Students; Majors (Students); College Entrance Examinations; Age Differences; Science Tests; ACT Assessment
AbstractComprehensive understanding of complex biological systems necessitates the use of computational models because they facilitate visualisation and interrogation of system dynamics and data-driven analysis. Computational model-based (CMB) activities have demonstrated effectiveness in improving students' understanding and their ability to use and reason with models. To maximise the effectiveness of computational modelling, this study examined an improved cognitive scaffolding and its impact on student learning of cellular respiration. This scaffolding proposes the "predict-observe-revise-explain" (PORE) sequence of tasks that explicitly challenge students to revise their predictions and computational models to resolve cognitive conflict. Based on revision work in a CMB activity, a sample of n = 362 undergraduate biology students were categorised into three groups -- not expected to revise (NR, n = 109), required-revised (RR, n = 179), and required-did not revise (RDNR, n = 74). Students' performance in "predict," "revise," and "explain" tasks were significantly associated with post-test performance. RR students were more than twice as likely to demonstrate a positive learning gain in the post-test ("odds ratio" = 2.47) compared to RDNR students. While science education has implicitly acknowledged revision as a critical cognitive process in modelling, this study presents evidence that making revision an explicit cognitive task in a CMB activity supports student learning of a complex biological system. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenRoutledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2024/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "International Journal of Science Education" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: