Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Beames, Joanne R.; Spanos, Samantha; Roberts, Anna; McGillivray, Lauren; Li, Sophie; Newby, Jill M.; O'Dea, Bridianne; Werner-Seidler, Aliza |
---|---|
Titel | Intervention Programs Targeting the Mental Health, Professional Burnout, and/or Wellbeing of School Teachers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses |
Quelle | In: Educational Psychology Review, 35 (2023) 1, Artikel 26 (27 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Beames, Joanne R.) ORCID (Spanos, Samantha) ORCID (Roberts, Anna) ORCID (McGillivray, Lauren) ORCID (Li, Sophie) ORCID (Newby, Jill M.) ORCID (O'Dea, Bridianne) ORCID (Werner-Seidler, Aliza) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1040-726X |
DOI | 10.1007/s10648-023-09720-w |
Schlagwörter | Intervention; Mental Health; Teacher Burnout; Well Being; Teacher Attitudes; Anxiety; Depression (Psychology); Preservice Teachers; Elementary School Teachers; Secondary School Teachers |
Abstract | This paper outlines a systematic review and meta-analyses to identify, describe, and evaluate randomised and non-randomised controlled trials of psychological programs targeting the mental health, professional burnout, and/or wellbeing of school classroom teachers. Eighty-eight unique studies were identified for inclusion in the review, and of those 46 were included in the meta-analyses (23 randomised controlled trials). In randomised controlled trials, the programs examined had large effects on stress (g=0.93), and moderate effects on anxiety (g=0.65), depression (g=0.51), professional burnout (g=0.57), and wellbeing (g=0.56) at post. In non-randomised controlled trials, programs had moderate effects on stress (g=0.50), and small effects on anxiety (g=0.38) and wellbeing (g=0.38) at post. Studies were heterogeneous in design and methodological quality was generally poor, particularly in non-randomised controlled trials. There was an inadequate number of comparisons to perform sub-group analyses, meta-regression, or publication bias analyses. Most of the programs examined required significant time, effort, and resources to deliver and complete. These programs may not translate well outside of research trials to real-world contexts due to teachers being time-poor. Priorities for research include using methodologically rigorous designs, developing programs for teachers with teachers (i.e. co-design), and considering implementation factors to ensure feasibility, acceptability, and uptake. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROPSERO - CRD42020159805. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |