Panoramic Video in Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2011 to 2021

Autor/inn/en	Li, Wenhao; Qian, Li; Feng, Qinna; Luo, Heng
Titel	Panoramic Video in Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2011 to 2021
Quelle	In: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39 (2023) 1, S.1-19 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Li, Wenhao) ORCID (Luo, Heng)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0266-4909
DOI	10.1111/jcal.12730
Schlagwörter	Video Technology; Technology Uses in Education; Instructional Design; Research Design; Outcomes of Education; Meta Analysis; Instructional Effectiveness; Educational Trends; Educational Research; Direct Instruction; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique); Interaction + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Technology enhanced learning; Technology aided learning; Technologieunterstütztes Lernen; Lesson concept; Lessonplan; Unterrichtsentwurf; Forschungsdesign; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Meta-analysis; Metaanalyse; Unterrichtserfolg; Bildungsentwicklung; Bildungsforschung; Pädagogische Forschung; Direct instructional procedues; Direct instructional approach; Unterrichtsverfahren; Interaktion
Abstract	Background: Panoramic video as a novel instructional media with increasing educational application. However, empirical research on panoramic video instruction is mostly episodic with conditional and inconclusive results. Objectives: This study reviewed 10 years (2011-2021) of research on panoramic video in education to synthesize, meta-analyse, and critically evaluate the state-of-art research findings, which can inform future educational practice and research directions. Methods: Following the protocol of systematic review, this study selected 83 articles from four major research databases and analysed them from five interrelated aspects: instructional context, technological features, instructional design, research design, and instructional effect. A meta-analysis was also conducted to determine the overall effectiveness of panoramic video on education and the moderating factors. Results and Conclusions: The results revealed a rapid upward trend in publication since 2018 with unequal distribution among regions and learning domains. Despite the technical advancement in immersion and interaction, panoramic videos were found to mainly support the acquisition of content and factual knowledge through direct instruction, and lack in-video scaffolding and assessment. Moreover, many interventions were one-time, short-term studies that are susceptible of novelty effect. Lastly, an overall medium effect (g = 0.711) of panoramic video was reported and six significant moderating factors were identified based on the meta-analysis results. Major takeaways and implications: Panoramic videos are ubiquitously effective across grade levels, learning domains, and pedagogies, but are more suitable for teaching conceptual knowledge. Design features such as interaction, scaffolding, assessment, iteration, and video length deserve our special attention in panoramic video instruction. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01