And the Rest Is History: Measuring the Scope and Recall of Wikipedia's Coverage of Three Women's Movement Subgroups

Autor/inn/en	Nelson, Laura K.; Getman, Rebekah; Haque, Syed Arefinul
Titel	And the Rest Is History: Measuring the Scope and Recall of Wikipedia's Coverage of Three Women's Movement Subgroups
Quelle	In: Sociological Methods & Research, 51 (2022) 4, S.1788-1825 (38 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Nelson, Laura K.) ORCID (Getman, Rebekah) ORCID (Haque, Syed Arefinul)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0049-1241
DOI	10.1177/00491241211067514
Schlagwörter	Encyclopedias; Collaborative Writing; Electronic Publishing; Females; Feminism; Groups; United States History; Recall (Psychology); Primary Sources; Working Class; Discourse Analysis; Social Action + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Encyclopedia; Enzyklopädie; Elektronisches Publizieren; Weibliches Geschlecht; Feminismus; Abberufung; Primärquelle; Arbeiterklasse; Diskursanalyse; Soziales Handeln
Abstract	Narrating history is perpetually contested, shaping and reshaping how nations and people understand both their pasts and the current moment. Measuring and evaluating the scope of histories is methodologically challenging. In this paper we provide a general approach and a specific method to measure historical recall. Operationalizing historical information as one or more word phrases, we use the phrase-mining RAKE algorithm on a collection of primary historical documents to extract first-person historical evidence, and then measure recall via phrases present on contemporary Wikipedia, taken to represent a publicly-accessible summary of existing knowledge on virtually any historical topic. We demonstrate this method using women's movements in the United States as a case study of a debated historical field. We found that issues important to working-class elements of the movement were less likely to be covered on Wikipedia compared to other subsections of the movement. Combining this method with a qualitative analysis of select articles, we identified a typology of mechanisms leading to historical omissions: paucity, restrictive paradigms, and categorical narrowness. Our approach, we conclude, can be used to both evaluate the recall of a body of history and to actively intervene in enlarging the scope of our histories and historical knowledge. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01