Comparing Coding Viewing and Recording Methods to Quantify Embedded Instruction Learning Trials

Autor/inn/en	Martin, Mackenzie K.; Snyder, Patricia A.; Reichow, Brian; Bishop, Crystal D.
Titel	Comparing Coding Viewing and Recording Methods to Quantify Embedded Instruction Learning Trials
Quelle	In: Journal of Early Intervention, 44 (2022) 4, S.353-370 (18 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Martin, Mackenzie K.) ORCID (Reichow, Brian) ORCID (Bishop, Crystal D.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1053-8151
DOI	10.1177/10538151211069528
Schlagwörter	Video Technology; Observation; Coding; Data Collection; Preschool Teachers; Preschool Children; Student Behavior; Students with Disabilities; Classroom Observation Techniques; Computer Software + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Beobachtung; Codierung; Programmierung; Data capture; Datensammlung; Pre-school education; Preschool education; Erzieher; Erzieherin; Kindergärtnerin; Vorschulerziehung; Vorschule; Pre-school age; Preschool age; Child; Children; Vorschulalter; Kind; Kinder; Vorschulkind; Vorschulkinder; Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; Student; Students; Disability; Disabilities; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Behinderung
Abstract	The purpose of this study was to examine the comparability of counts of embedded instruction learning trials when different methods of viewing and recording direct behavioral observations were used. In 13 classrooms, while videotaping embedded instruction implementation for a larger randomized controlled efficacy trial was occurring, teachers' implementation of trials was coded in situ using pencil-and-paper methods. Videos were later coded using computer-assisted methods. Dependent-samples "t" tests, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, and additional score agreement calculations were conducted. Statistically significant differences were found in the estimates of trial frequency. Correlational analyses showed positive and strong relationships between the coding methods. Coding agreement was higher across the entire observation versus during 10-min continuous event blocks. In situ coding took significantly less time than video coding. Results provide empirical evidence for the advantages and disadvantages of common viewing and recording methods for quantifying behavior as part of systematic observation systems. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01