Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Sudakova, Natalia E.; Savina, Tatyana N.; Masalimova, Alfiya R.; Mikhaylovsky, Mikhail N.; Karandeeva, Lyudmila G.; Zhdanov, Sergei P.
Titel	Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis
Quelle	In: Education Sciences, 12 (2022), Artikel 209 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Sudakova, Natalia E.) ORCID (Masalimova, Alfiya R.)
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Computer Assisted Testing; Formative Evaluation; Higher Education; Bibliometrics; Electronic Learning; Integrated Learning Systems; Distance Education; Evaluation Methods; Foreign Countries; United States; United Kingdom; Australia; Spain; Germany; Malaysia; Turkey; Canada; South Africa; Saudi Arabia; China; India; Iran; Hong Kong; Portugal; Finland; Netherlands; New Zealand; Romania + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Bibliometrie; Distance study; Distance learning; Fernunterricht; Ausland; USA; Großbritannien; Australien; Spanien; Deutschland; Türkei; Kanada; Südafrika; Süd-Afrika; Republik Südafrika; Südafrikanische Republik; Saudi-Arabien; Indien; Hongkong; Finnland; Niederlande; Neuseeland; Rumänien
Abstract	Assessment is critical in postsecondary education, as it is at all levels. Assessments are classified into four types: diagnostic, summative, evaluative, and formative. Recent trends in assessment have migrated away from summative to formative evaluations. Formative evaluations help students develop expertise and concentrate their schedules, ease student anxiety, instill a feeling of ownership in students as they go, and confirm the module's subject notion. Online formative assessment (OFA) emerged as a result of the convergence of formative and computer-assisted assessment research. Bibliometric analyses provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of a study topic across a particular time period. We used a PRISMA-compliant bibliometric method. The Scopus database was searched for BibTex-formatted publication data. In total, 898 studies were analyzed. According to the results, "Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education" and "Computers & Education" are the most influential sources. RWTH Aachen University and Universitat Oberta De Catalunya are the most effective institutions. The red cluster includes terms associated with higher education and evaluation. The word "e-assessment, e-learning, assessment, moodle" appears in the green cluster. This group is quite influential yet has a low centrality. The highest percentage is 79.2 for "online assessment". The subject is comprised of three components: "distance learning", "accessibility", and "assessment design". The most important topics were "e-assessment", "higher education", and "online learning". According to the country participation network, the USA and UK were the two main centers. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: education@mdpi.com; e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01