Perceptions of Performativity in English Further Education

Autor/in	Poole, Richard
Titel	Perceptions of Performativity in English Further Education
Quelle	In: Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 27 (2022) 1, S.148-172 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Poole, Richard)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1359 6748
DOI	10.1080/13596748.2021.2011518
Schlagwörter	Accountability; Adult Education; Foreign Countries; Administrator Role; Teacher Role; Educational Benefits; Middle Management; Job Satisfaction; Motivation; Collegiality; Educational Objectives; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Verantwortung; Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Ausland; Lehrerrolle; Bildungsertrag; Mittlere Führungskraft; Labor; Labour; Satisfaction; Arbeit; Zufriedenheit; psychologische; Motivation (psychologisch); Kollegialität; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel
Abstract	The notions of performativity and the use of accountability practices within the UK education sector are contentious. Although some commentators suggest that statistically driven performativity measures do not align with practitioner values, little research has investigated any potential differences in relation to job role and level of management responsibility. This study focused on whether perceptions of performativity change according to someone's job role and whether there is a differential between managers and teachers. An electronic questionnaire was disseminated at a single FE college, with 107 participants surveyed across a wide range of subject areas. Quantitative analysis revealed that perceptions of managers differ from those of teaching staff regarding the effectiveness of statistical performativity targets to drive factors which are integral to an efficacious learning environment. Results are far from unequivocal though. As practitioners take on more of a managerial emphasis within their role, the perceived benefit of and their affinity for target setting and performativity measures increase. However, the magnitude of this more favourable outlook towards performativity is limited, with managers also broadly sceptical concerning any benefit and positive impact that target setting practices can have. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01