Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Morrison, Keith |
---|---|
Titel | Conceptual Replications, Research, and the "What Works" Agenda in Education |
Quelle | In: Educational Research and Evaluation, 27 (2022) 1-2, S.35-60 (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Morrison, Keith) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1380-3611 |
DOI | 10.1080/13803611.2021.2022314 |
Schlagwörter | Replication (Evaluation); Educational Research; Construct Validity; Generalizability Theory; Accuracy; Definitions; Research Methodology; Research Design |
Abstract | Conceptual replications have received increased coverage in the educational research agenda. This article argues for clarity in, and justification of, the definition, scope, and boundaries of a conceptual replication and what it can and cannot do. It argues for clear justifications when changing components from those of the original study. The article raises issues concerning internal validity and construct validity which arise from the elision of replication with applicability and generalisability in a conceptual replication, and questions how far the "concept" needs, and can obtain, greater separation from context. It indicates limits to the power of conceptual replications to falsify and verify the original study, and argues for greater specificity, precision, accuracy, and attention to contexts, conditions, and causality and their influence on outcomes. Implications are drawn for preparing, planning, conducting, analysing, judging, and reporting "fair" conceptual replications in education, identifying 10 "rules" for a fair conceptual replication. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |