Brief Research Report: A Comparison of Robust Tests for Homogeneity of Variance in Factorial ANOVA

Autor/inn/en	Yi, Zhiyao; Chen, Yi-Hsin; Yin, Yue; Cheng, Ke; Wang, Yan; Nguyen, Diep; Pham, Thanh; Kim, EunSook
Titel	Brief Research Report: A Comparison of Robust Tests for Homogeneity of Variance in Factorial ANOVA
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Education, 90 (2022) 2, S.505-520 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0022-0973
DOI	10.1080/00220973.2020.1789833
Schlagwörter	Statistical Analysis; Robustness (Statistics); Sampling; Statistical Inference + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Statistische Analyse; Widerstandsfähigkeit; Inferential statistics; Schließende Statistik
Abstract	A simulation study was conducted to examine the efficacy of nine frequently-used HOV tests, including Levene's tests with squared residuals and with absolute residuals, Brown and Forsythe (BF) test, Bootstrap BF test, O'Brien test, Z-variance test, Box-Scheffé (BS) test, Bartlett test, and Pseudo jackknife test under comprehensive simulation conditions. The results indicate that O'Brien, Levene's with squared deviations, BS, BF, and Bootstrap BF tests had adequate Type I error control, especially for O'Brien test and Levene's test with squared deviations. Under conditions of adequately controlling for Type I error, BF and Bootstrap BF tests had consistently higher power estimates across simulation conditions. Practical recommendations of guidelines for HOV test selection in factorial ANOVA designs are presented in the paper. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01