Researching Intercultural Competence in Language Learners: Gaps between Theory and Methodology

Autor/in	Tiurikova, Irina
Titel	Researching Intercultural Competence in Language Learners: Gaps between Theory and Methodology
Quelle	In: Intercultural Communication Education, 4 (2021) 2, S.122-136 (15 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Tiurikova, Irina)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2209-1041
Schlagwörter	Cultural Awareness; Intercultural Communication; Measures (Individuals); Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Cultural Differences; Ethnicity; Cultural Background; Personality Measures; Communicative Competence (Languages); Questionnaires; Comparative Analysis; Research Methodology; Theories; Self Concept; Intercultural Development Inventory + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Cultural identity; Kulturelle Identität; Interkulturelle Kommunikation; Messdaten; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Kultureller Unterschied; Ethnizität; Communicative competence; Languages; Kommunikative Kompetenz; Sprache; Fragebogen; Research method; Forschungsmethode; Theory; Theorie; Selbstkonzept
Abstract	Traditional approaches to intercultural competence (IC) in language learning have been criticised for reproducing cultural differentialism, a theoretical perspective which emphasises that people are different due to essential distinctions between their ethnic or national cultural background. While differentialist views have been recognised as problematic in the theory of IC, it remains to be examined whether and how cultural differentialism is reflected in the methodological tools used in empirical research in the field. To shed light on this issue, the article analyses five questionnaires studying IC or related concepts: the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire (van der Zee & van Oudenhoven, 2001), the Intercultural Development Inventory (Hammer et al., 2003), the Intercultural Communicative Competence Instrument (Arasaratnam, 2009), the Intercultural Effectiveness Scale (Portalla & Chen, 2010) and the Ungspråk Questionnaire (Haukås et al., 2021b). The analysis reveals that cultural differentialism persists at the level of methodology. However, the extent to which questionnaires reproduce it varies according to how notions of culture, identity, differences and similarities are reflected in the questionnaire statements. The paper also discusses the possible implications of using methodological tools that reproduce cultural differentialism. It also provides some recommendations that can help researchers avoid this problematic approach in an empirical study. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Castledown Publishers. 447 Broadway, 2nd Floor Suite 393, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 646-520-0676; e-mail: journals@castledown.com; Web site: https://www.castledown.com/journals/ice/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01