Systematizing Audit in Algorithmic Recruitment

Autor/inn/en	Kazim, Emre; Koshiyama, Adriano Soares; Hilliard, Airlie; Polle, Roseline
Titel	Systematizing Audit in Algorithmic Recruitment
Quelle	In: Journal of Intelligence, 9 (2021), Artikel 46 (11 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Kazim, Emre)
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2079-3200
Schlagwörter	Psychology; Individual Differences; Artificial Intelligence; Personality; Recruitment; Employment Interviews; Computer Mediated Communication; Videoconferencing; Psychometrics; Governance; Accountability; Automation; Mathematics; Audits (Verification); Measurement; Bias; Compliance (Legal); Privacy + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Psychologie; Individueller Unterschied; Künstliche Intelligenz; Personalität; Recruiting; Rekrutierung; Employment interview; Employment interviewing; Einstellungsgespräch; Bewerbungsgespräch; Computerkonferenz; Psychometry; Psychometrie; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Verantwortung; Mathematik; Messverfahren; Privatsphäre
Abstract	Business psychologists study and assess relevant individual differences, such as intelligence and personality, in the context of work. Such studies have informed the development of artificial intelligence systems (AI) designed to measure individual differences. This has been capitalized on by companies who have developed AI-driven recruitment solutions that include aggregation of appropriate candidates ("Hiretual"), interviewing through a chatbot ("Paradox"), video interview assessment ("MyInterview"), and CV-analysis ("Textio"), as well as estimation of psychometric characteristics through image-("Traitify") and game-based assessments ("HireVue") and video interviews ("Cammio"). However, driven by concern that such high-impact technology must be used responsibly due to the potential for unfair hiring to result from the algorithms used by these tools, there is an active effort towards proving mechanisms of governance for such automation. In this article, we apply a systematic algorithm audit framework in the context of the ethically critical industry of algorithmic recruitment systems, exploring how audit assessments on AI-driven systems can be used to assure that such systems are being responsibly deployed in a fair and well-governed manner. We outline sources of risk for the use of algorithmic hiring tools, suggest the most appropriate opportunities for audits to take place, recommend ways to measure bias in algorithms, and discuss the transparency of algorithms. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; e-mail: jintelligence@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jintelligence
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01