Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Conway, Andrew R. A.; Kovacs, Kristof; Hao, Han; Rosales, Kevin P.; Snijder, Jean-Paul |
|---|---|
| Titel | Individual Differences in Attention and Intelligence: A United Cognitive/Psychometric Approach |
| Quelle | In: Journal of Intelligence, 9 (2021), Artikel 34 (23 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Conway, Andrew R. A.) ORCID (Kovacs, Kristof) ORCID (Hao, Han) ORCID (Snijder, Jean-Paul) |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
| ISSN | 2079-3200 |
| Schlagwörter | Individual Differences; Attention; Intelligence; Executive Function; Theories; Correlation; Simulation; Models; Cognitive Development; Neurological Impairments; Cognitive Processes; Cognitive Psychology; Evaluation Methods; Vocabulary |
| Abstract | Process overlap theory (POT) is a new theoretical framework designed to account for the general factor of intelligence ("g"). According to POT, g does not reflect a general cognitive ability. Instead, "g" is the result of multiple domain-general executive attention processes and multiple domain-specific processes that are sampled in an overlapping manner across a battery of intelligence tests. POT explains several benchmark findings on human intelligence. However, the precise nature of the executive attention processes underlying g remains unclear. In the current paper, we discuss challenges associated with building a theory of individual differences in attention and intelligence. We argue that the conflation of psychological theories and statistical models, as well as problematic inferences based on latent variables, impedes research progress and prevents theory building. Two studies designed to illustrate the unique features of POT relative to previous approaches are presented. In Study 1, a simulation is presented to illustrate precisely how POT accounts for the relationship between executive attention processes and "g." In Study 2, three datasets from previous studies are reanalyzed (N = 243, N = 234, N = 945) and reveal a discrepancy between the POT simulated model and the unity/diversity model of executive function. We suggest that this discrepancy is largely due to methodological problems in previous studies but also reflects different goals of research on individual differences in attention. The unity/diversity model is designed to facilitate research on executive function and dysfunction associated with cognitive and neural development and disease. POT is uniquely suited to guide and facilitate research on individual differences in cognitive ability and the investigation of executive attention processes underlying "g." (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; e-mail: jintelligence@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jintelligence |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
