Examining the Differential Effectiveness and Efficiency of Alternative Multiplication Drill Interventions with Third-Grade Students

Autor/inn/en	Adams, Sarah R.; Maki, Kathrin E.
Titel	Examining the Differential Effectiveness and Efficiency of Alternative Multiplication Drill Interventions with Third-Grade Students
Quelle	In: Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37 (2020) 4, S.352-376 (25 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Maki, Kathrin E.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1537-7903
DOI	10.1080/15377903.2020.1848956
Schlagwörter	Multiplication; Intervention; Drills (Practice); Retention (Psychology); Mathematics Skills; Skill Development; Error Patterns; Instructional Materials; Instructional Effectiveness; Grade 3; Elementary School Students; Public Schools; Achievement Tests; Measures of Academic Progress + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Multiplikation; Merkfähigkeit; Mathmatics achievement; Mathematics ability; Mathematische Kompetenz; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Fehlertyp; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Unterrichtserfolg; School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; Public school; Öffentliche Schule; Achievement test; Achievement; Testing; Test; Tests; Leistungsbeurteilung; Leistungsüberprüfung; Leistung; Testdurchführung; Testen
Abstract	A large number of students demonstrate difficulty acquiring and retaining math facts highlighting the need for early math intervention. This study used a single-case cumulative acquisition design to examine the differential effectiveness and efficiency of three drill interventions, incremental rehearsal (IR), incremental rehearsal with visual representations (IRR), and traditional drill (TD) for teaching multiplication facts to three third-grade students with multiplication difficulties in a school setting. Results were mixed regarding intervention effectiveness as little differentiation was evident in students' cumulative next day multiplication fact retention across the three intervention conditions. Students made significantly more errors in the TD condition and maintained the most multiplication facts one week after the interventions in the IR condition. TD was the most efficient intervention as students retained the most multiplication facts per instructional minute in this condition, with the IR conditions requiring significantly more time to implement than the TD condition. Implications for intervention practices and future research are discussed. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01