In Defense of 'Copying and Restructuring'

Autor/inn/en	Schwartz, Bonnie D.; Sprouse, Rex A.
Titel	In Defense of 'Copying and Restructuring'
Quelle	In: Second Language Research, 37 (2021) 3, S.489-493 (5 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Schwartz, Bonnie D.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0267-6583
DOI	10.1177/0267658320975831
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Linguistic Theory; Second Language Learning; Native Language; Transfer of Training; Psycholinguistics; Cues; Multilingualism; Models; Criticism; Learning Processes; Grammar; Language Universals; Brain Hemisphere Functions + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Linguistische Theorie; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Training; Transfer; Ausbildung; Psycholinguistik; Stichwort; Mehrsprachigkeit; Multilingualismus; Analogiemodell; Kritik; Learning process; Lernprozess; Grammatik
Abstract	In her keynote article advocating the Linguistic Proximity Model for third language (L3) acquisition, Westergaard (2021) presents several arguments against 'copying and restructuring' in nonnative language acquisition, mechanisms central to Schwartz and Sprouse's (1996) Full Transfer/Full Access model of second language (L2) acquisition. In this commentary, we seek to counter her arguments and also show that the results of a large body of studies on nonnative language acquisition are explained only by 'copying and restructuring'. [For "Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition," see EJ1300541.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01