Facilitators and Barriers of Co-Production of Services with Children and Young People within Education, Health and Care Services

Autor/inn/en	Boswell, Naomi; Woods, Kevin
Titel	Facilitators and Barriers of Co-Production of Services with Children and Young People within Education, Health and Care Services
Quelle	In: Educational & Child Psychology, 38 (2021) 2, S.41-52 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0267-1611
Schlagwörter	Barriers; Social Justice; Children; Adolescents; Youth; Disabilities; Equal Education; Access to Education; Access to Health Care; Participation; Civil Rights; Special Needs Students; Students with Disabilities; Participative Decision Making; Interpersonal Relationship; Professional Personnel; Beliefs; Leadership Responsibility; Social Services + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Soziale Gerechtigkeit; Child; Kind; Kinder; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; Handicap; Behinderung; Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Teilnahme; Bürgerrechte; Grundrechte; Zivilrecht; Sonderpädagogischer Förderbedarf; Student; Students; Disability; Disabilities; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Interpersonal relation; Interpersonal relations; Interpersonelle Beziehung; Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung; Personalbestand; Belief; Glaube; Social service; Soziale Dienstleistung; Soziale Dienste
Abstract	Aim: This systematic review of research studies published between 2014 and 2019 explores facilitators and barriers to successful co-production and its application to practice. Rationale: Through legislation, 'co-production' underpins practice to promote social justice for children and young people (CYP) with Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND). Yet little is known about how to engage in co-production successfully. Method: Through systematic searching of research databases, a total of 21 papers was found, seven of which met inclusion criteria and were found to be of at least medium level methodological quality and relevance. Findings: The included research papers highlight the importance of leadership support for co-production to enable CYP to really 'be heard', as well as practical considerations around transport and support to attend co-production meetings. Creative methods chosen by CYP, flexibility to the needs of CYP and valuing CYP's time and views were significant factors in creating change through co-production. Implications: A lack of funding, commitment and awareness by leaders and organisations to ensure that CYP can participate over time, often however, led to unsustainable co-production endeavours. Limitations: A significant gap was identified within the co-production of Education services, with the majority of research papers developing co-production and social justice practice within Health and Social Care organisations. Conclusions: Implications for development of practice and further research are considered. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	British Psychological Society. St Andrews House, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester, LE1 7DR, UK. Tel: +44-116-254-9568; e-mail: info@bps.org.uk; Web site: https://beta.bps.org.uk/publications
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01