Shifting Barriers to the Acceptance of Evolution in an Underrepresented Student Group

Autor/inn/en	Siciliano-Martina, Leila; Martina, Jason P.
Titel	Shifting Barriers to the Acceptance of Evolution in an Underrepresented Student Group
Quelle	In: International Journal of Science Education, 42 (2020) 13, S.2205-2223 (19 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Siciliano-Martina, Leila) ORCID (Martina, Jason P.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0950-0693
DOI	10.1080/09500693.2020.1815247
Schlagwörter	Barriers; Science Instruction; Disproportionate Representation; Evolution; Student Characteristics; Catholics; Church Related Colleges; Student Attitudes; Religious Factors; Cultural Background; Teaching Methods; Online Courses; Nonmajors; Measures (Individuals); Scores; Social Influences; Course Descriptions; Concept Formation; Scientific Concepts + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Katholik; Kirchliche Hochschule; Schülerverhalten; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Online course; Online-Kurs; Messdaten; Sozialer Einfluss; Kursstrukturplan; Concept learning; Begriffsbildung
Abstract	Threshold concepts can lead to higher discipline comprehension but may also lead to the formation of educational barriers. The acceptance of evolutionary theory, a threshold concept, may be impacted by barriers associated with a student's educational, religious, psychological, and social background. The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy of teaching evolution online and to assess how educational barriers affect the acceptance of the theory. Pre- and post-semester surveys were distributed to students in a non-science major's online evolution course at a primarily minority-serving Catholic university to evaluate potential barriers and student's Measure of Acceptance of Evolution (MATE). MATE scores increased significantly by the end of the semester, suggesting that online platforms may be effective for evolution education. Learning barriers shifted during the semester: while reported religiosity remained unchanged, it was significantly correlated with MATE scores in the pre- but not post-surveys. Psychological and science understanding barriers were also significant predictors of MATE scores in the pre-survey, whereas only psychological and social barriers were significant in the post-survey. These results suggest that religiosity need not be impacted by evolution education and barriers associated with religiosity are not insurmountable and are reduced by the exposure to evolution education. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01