CLIL Methodology, Materials and Resources, and Assessment in a Monolingual Context: An Analysis of Stakeholders' Perceptions in Andalusia

Autor/inn/en	Barrios, Elvira; Milla Lara, María Dolores
Titel	CLIL Methodology, Materials and Resources, and Assessment in a Monolingual Context: An Analysis of Stakeholders' Perceptions in Andalusia
Quelle	In: Language Learning Journal, 48 (2020) 1, S.60-80 (21 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Barrios, Elvira)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0957-1736
DOI	10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269
Schlagwörter	Teaching Methods; Bilingual Education Programs; Course Content; Interdisciplinary Approach; Language of Instruction; Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; English (Second Language); Foreign Countries; Instructional Innovation; Teacher Education; Student Attitudes; Teacher Attitudes; Parent Attitudes; Monolingualism; Elementary Secondary Education; Spain + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Kursprogramm; Fächerübergreifender Unterricht; Fächerverbindender Unterricht; Interdisziplinarität; Teaching language; Unterrichtssprache; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Fremdsprachenunterricht; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Ausland; Educational Innovation; Bildungsinnovation; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Schülerverhalten; Lehrerverhalten; Elternverhalten; Spanien
Abstract	This paper presents an investigation into stakeholder perspectives on the methodology, materials and resources and assessment procedures employed in a bilingual (CLIL) programme in a monolingual context. A total of 873 respondents (544 students, 92 teachers and 237 parents) in Andalusia, Spain (more specifically, in the provinces of Málaga and Cádiz) took part in the study. Questionnaires and focus groups were used to gauge stakeholder perspectives on important curricular issues, which were then interpreted within the framework of a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis. The most commonly reported methodological strength of the programme was its use of innovative pedagogical practices, which seem to be spreading from the CLIL programme into the mainstream programme. Inadequate teacher training in the CLIL methodology was the most commonly reported weakness by teachers. To provide a more comprehensive picture of stakeholders' views of the programme between-group comparisons were also performed. These indicated that there were group differences in perceptions of numerous CLIL-related issues, which emphasises the need to pay attention to how the different groups involved interpret the CLIL educational experience. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01