An Initial Evaluation of a Concurrent Operant Analysis Framework to Identify Reinforcers for Work Completion

Autor/inn/en	Lloyd, Blair P.; Randall, Kayla R.; Weaver, Emily S.; Staubitz, Johanna L.; Parikh, Naomi
Titel	An Initial Evaluation of a Concurrent Operant Analysis Framework to Identify Reinforcers for Work Completion
Quelle	In: Behavioral Disorders, 45 (2020) 2, S.85-102 (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext (1); PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei (2) Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Lloyd, Blair P.) Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0198-7429
DOI	10.1177/0198742919837647
Schlagwörter	Functional Behavioral Assessment; Behavior Problems; Student Behavior; Reinforcement; Intervention; Outcomes of Treatment; Evaluation Methods; Elementary School Students + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; Positive Verstärkung
Abstract	Although functional analysis is a powerful tool for testing the function of challenging behavior, it is not always feasible or appropriate to include as a component of functional behavior assessment (FBA). Alternative experimental analysis methods are needed to inform individualized interventions in schools, particularly for students who engage in passive forms of problem behavior. We evaluated a concurrent operant analysis (COA) framework to identify reinforcers for appropriate replacement behaviors for four students referred for FBA and reported by teachers to engage in low levels of work completion. After completing two COAs per student (researcher-as-therapist and teacher-as-therapist), we used alternating treatments designs to compare the effects of an intervention matched with COA outcomes to intervention conditions that were not matched to COA outcomes on levels of work completion and task engagement. COA outcomes corresponded across therapists for three of four participants and intervention results validated COA outcomes for two of these participants. Although results of this initial investigation seem promising, more research on COA frameworks is needed to determine their utility to guide reinforcement-based interventions in schools. [For the corresponding grantee submission, see ED594806.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01