Comparing Self-Directed Video Prompting to Least-to-Most Prompting in Post-Secondary Students with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities

Autor/inn/en	Cannella-Malone, Helen I.; Chan, Jeffrey M.; Jimenez, Eliseo D.
Titel	Comparing Self-Directed Video Prompting to Least-to-Most Prompting in Post-Secondary Students with Moderate Intellectual Disabilities
Quelle	In: International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63 (2017) 4, S.211-220 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2047-3869
DOI	10.1080/20473869.2017.1301695
Schlagwörter	Prompting; College Students; Moderate Intellectual Disability; Video Technology; Job Skills; Telecommunications; Handheld Devices; Educational Technology; Error Correction; Skill Development; Teaching Methods; Program Effectiveness; Autism; Down Syndrome + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Benutzerführung; Collegestudent; Produktive Fertigkeit; Telekommunikationstechnik; Unterrichtsmedien; Korrektur; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Autismus; 'Downs Syndrome; Down''s Syndrome'; Down-Syndrom
Abstract	Objectives: This study compared the effects of self-directed video prompting with error correction using an iPod Touch to least-to-most prompting on teaching vocational skills to two post-secondary students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Methods: Students were first taught to use the inPromptu mobile application on the iPod Touch. They were then taught to collate and pack a large envelope and to tri-fold papers and pack a business envelope. The two tasks were counterbalanced across students in an adapted alternating treatments design. Students were instructed to use self-directed video prompting with error correction to teach themselves one skill, and an instructor used least-to-most prompting to teach the second skill. Data were also collected on sessions to criterion and maintenance of the skills over time. Results: Results demonstrated that both instructional techniques were effective in teaching the skills, and students generalized their use of the technology to learn a new skill with no additional instruction. These results were replicated with one of the students. Conclusions: Self-directed video prompting with error correction and least-to-most prompting were nearly equivalent in terms of acquisition efficiency and maintenance. These findings suggest that self-directed video prompting with error correction could be used in vocational settings, allowing job coaches to fade more quickly and for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to be more independent. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01