Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Syarifudin; Purwanto; Irawan, Edy Bambang; Sulandra, I Made; Fikriyah, Ummu |
---|---|
Titel | Student Verbal Interaction in Geometry Problem-Solving through Cognitive Activities |
Quelle | In: International Journal of Instruction, 12 (2019) 3, S.167-182 (16 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1694-609X |
Schlagwörter | Geometry; Mathematics Instruction; Problem Solving; Verbal Communication; Learning Activities; Group Discussion; Thinking Skills; Video Technology; Peer Relationship; Case Studies; Essay Tests; Mathematics Tests; Teaching Methods; Junior High School Students; Foreign Countries; Indonesia Geometrie; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Problemlösen; Lernaktivität; Gruppendiskussion; Denkfähigkeit; Peer-Beziehungen; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Schriftlicher Sprachgebrauch; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Junior High Schools; Student; Students; Sekundarstufe I; Schüler; Schülerin; Ausland; Indonesien |
Abstract | This qualitative study aimed at describing student verbal interaction verbally through cognitive activities consisting of procedural, disputational, and exploration in solving geometry problems. This research was in the form of students' verbal interaction activities in group discussion which decribe students' thinking process in detail, both the correct and incorrect thinking process, when conveying their ideas to their friends to solve a problem. The data were collected through a video recording and made in the form of dialogue transcriptions. The research results showed that the form of student verbal interaction on the procedural activity namely (1) students conveyed their ideas to their peers without arguing with each other; (2) discussion activities with planning as its nature; (3) students shared information used in problem-solving. The form of student verbal interaction on the disputational activities were (1) students responded to each other ideas, suggestions, or answers between individuals; (2) students defended each other's ideas or answers so that it triggered a group discussion; (3) the activities would end when all the group member have the appropriateness of the thinking process from the discussed problems. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | International Journal of Instruction. Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Education, Eskisehir, 26480, Turkey. e-mail: iji@ogu.edu.tr; Web site: http://www.e-iji.net |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |