Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Spencer, Mercedes; Gilmour, Allison F.; Miller, Amanda C.; Emerson, Angela M.; Saha, Neena M.; Cutting, Laurie E. |
---|---|
Titel | Understanding the Influence of Text Complexity and Question Type on Reading Outcomes |
Quelle | In: Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32 (2019) 3, S.603-637 (35 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0922-4777 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11145-018-9883-0 |
Schlagwörter | Student Characteristics; Cognitive Ability; Reading Comprehension; Item Response Theory; Prediction; Oral Reading; Reading Fluency; Recall (Psychology); Inferences; Adolescents; Reading Strategies; Multiple Choice Tests; Reading Achievement; Reading Tests; Test Items; Item Analysis Denkfähigkeit; Leseverstehen; Item-Response-Theorie; Vorhersage; Oral work; Reading; Mündliche Übung; Leseprozess; Lesen; Abberufung; Inference; Inferenz; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; Reading strategy; Leselernstufe; Lesetechnik; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Leseleistung; Lesetest; Test content; Testaufgabe; Itemanalyse |
Abstract | In the current study, we examined how student characteristics and cognitive skills, differing levels of text complexity (cohesion, decoding, vocabulary, and syntax), and reading comprehension question types (literal, inferential, critical analysis, and reading strategy) affected different types of reading outcomes (multiple-choice reading comprehension questions, free recall, and oral reading fluency) in a sample of 181 native English-speaking adolescents (9 to 14.83 years). Results from item response theory one-parameter models and multilevel models suggested that different cognitive skills predicted performance across the three reading outcomes. After controlling for student characteristics and cognitive skills, text complexity negatively impacted reading outcomes, particularly oral reading fluency and free recall. Critical analysis and inferential questions emerged as the most difficult types of comprehension questions. The implications of these findings are discussed. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |