Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enTasdemir, Muhammed Salih; Yalcin Arslan, Fadime
TitelFeedback Preferences of EFL Learners with Respect to Their Learning Styles
QuelleIn: Cogent Education, 5 (2018) 1, Artikel 1481560 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
ZusatzinformationORCID (Tasdemir, Muhammed Salih)
ORCID (Yalcin Arslan, Fadime)
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN2331-186X
DOI10.1080/2331186X.2018.1481560
SchlagwörterFeedback (Response); English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Cognitive Style; Preferences; Error Correction; Correlation; Foreign Countries; College Students; Language Teachers; Teacher Student Relationship; Oral Language; Student Attitudes; Metalinguistics; Measures (Individuals); Turkey; Learning Style Inventory
AbstractThis study investigates the preferences of EFL learners for oral corrective feedback in relation to their learning styles in order to determine whether there exists a relationship between the two. The sample consisted of 348 preparatory class students studying English as a Foreign Language at a state university in Turkey. A questionnaire was administered to explore learners' oral corrective feedback preferences, and a learning style inventory was utilized to classify participants' learning styles. To analyse the obtained data, the frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation values were calculated, and a Chi-square test was employed to determine whether there existed a relationship between student feedback preferences and their learning styles. Most participants were classified as divergent learners, and they seemed to expect their teachers to provide frequent feedback. Moreover, they believed that frequent and serious errors should be addressed more often than occasional and minor ones. Explicit feedback, clarification and elicitation were the most preferred types of feedback, with teachers being the most favored source. These results suggest that learning styles do not account for students' feedback preferences and provide an explanation in terms of learners' varied preferences. Therefore, it has been concluded that the concept of learning styles is irrelevant for understanding learner feedback preference. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenCogent OA. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Cogent Education" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: