Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Chan, Cecilia K. Y.; Fong, Emily T. Y. |
---|---|
Titel | Disciplinary Differences and Implications for the Development of Generic Skills: A Study of Engineering and Business Students' Perceptions of Generic Skills |
Quelle | In: European Journal of Engineering Education, 43 (2018) 6, S.927-949 (23 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0304-3797 |
DOI | 10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766 |
Schlagwörter | Foreign Countries; College Freshmen; Majors (Students); Engineering Education; Business Administration Education; Basic Skills; Intellectual Disciplines; Comparative Analysis; Learning Motivation; Skill Development; Student Attitudes; Curriculum Design; Interdisciplinary Approach; Information Technology; Self Management; Interpersonal Competence; Communication Skills; Teamwork; Cultural Awareness; Hong Kong Ausland; Studienanfänger; Ingenieurausbildung; Basic skill; Grundfertigkeit; Geisteswissenschaften; Motivation for studies; Lernmotivation; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Schülerverhalten; Lehrplangestaltung; Fächerübergreifender Unterricht; Fächerverbindender Unterricht; Interdisziplinarität; Informationstechnologie; Selbstmanagement; Interpersonale Kompetenz; Kommunikationsstil; Cultural identity; Kulturelle Identität; Hongkong |
Abstract | Although previous research has examined how generic skills and disciplinary contexts are related, such investigation has not been conducted from students' perspectives. Implications of disciplinary differences for the design of a generic skills curriculum have also remained unexplored. In this study, a questionnaire was administered to 502 first-year engineering and business students from a Hong Kong university which explored their perceived importance and competence level of their generic skills, as well as their motivation towards developing these skills. The results of engineering and business students were compared which revealed some disciplinary differences. Substantial differences were found in the importance and competency ratings on IT skills and business students gave significantly higher importance ratings on most generic skills than engineering students. This study will help guide curriculum design that leverages the benefits of interdisciplinary programmes and incorporates generic skills as part of learning outcomes within disciplinary contexts. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |