Latent Profile Analysis of the Good Teacher Characteristics in the 21st Century in the Northeastern Region of Thailand

Autor/inn/en	Sripai, Sunan; Wanawan, Ketkanok
Titel	Latent Profile Analysis of the Good Teacher Characteristics in the 21st Century in the Northeastern Region of Thailand
Quelle	In: Educational Research and Reviews, 13 (2018) 4, S.136-143 (8 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1990-3839
Schlagwörter	Profiles; Teacher Characteristics; Classification; Interviews; Teacher Attitudes; Expertise; Awards; Elementary School Teachers; Sampling; Factor Analysis; Questionnaires; Reliability; Probability; Role Models; Foreign Countries; Statistical Analysis; Thailand + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Charakterisierung; Profilanalyse; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Lehrerverhalten; Expert appraisal; Award; Auszeichnung; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Faktorenanalyse; Fragebogen; Reliabilität; Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung; Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie; Identifikationsfigur; Ausland; Statistische Analyse
Abstract	This research aimed to analyze the Latent Group Profile, hereafter (LPA) of good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century in the Northeastern region of Thailand. The samples were 4 groups, viz; 10 expert teachers for interviewing on the draft of the variable to develop the indicators; 12 teachers who won Guru Awards from Teachers Council for in-depth interviewing and use the data to adjust the variable to confirm good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century in a real situation. 1,103 primary school teachers in the Northeastern region were random from 11 provinces and were selected by applying multi-stage sampling technique and employed them for second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The research instrument was a set of 71 items questionnaire focusing on the good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century. The reliability of the questionnaire was at 0.933 and the discrepancy was between 0.264-0.696. The research findings revealed that, the LPA had 3 models, and the numbers of the groups in each model were 2, 3 and 4, respectively. When considering the probability that the classification was the most accurate (E_k), it was the model with 2 groups (likelihood = -7138.381, AIC = 14344.763, BIC = 14514.960, ABIC = 14406.967, E_k = 0.954). The proportion of the teachers in the LPA group 1 were 483 teachers, who were being a good role model for the learners (43.79%) and the LPA group 2 were 620 teachers, who believed in good values (56.21%). (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Academic Journals. e-mail: err@academic.journals.org; e-mail: service@academicjournals.org; Web site: http://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01