Will Teachers Create Opportunities for Discussion When Teaching Proof in a Geometry Classroom?

Autor/inn/en	Erickson, Ander; Herbst, Patricio
Titel	Will Teachers Create Opportunities for Discussion When Teaching Proof in a Geometry Classroom?
Quelle	In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16 (2018) 1, S.167-181 (15 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Erickson, Ander)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1571-0068
DOI	10.1007/s10763-016-9764-4
Schlagwörter	Mathematics Teachers; Mathematics Instruction; Geometry; Mathematical Logic; Validity; Secondary School Teachers; Secondary School Mathematics; High School Students; Classroom Communication; Multimedia Instruction; Decision Making; Educational Practices; Teaching Methods; Norms + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Mathematics; Teacher; Teachers; Mathematik; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Geometrie; Mathematical logics; Mathematische Logik; Gültigkeit; High school; High schools; Student; Students; Oberschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Studentin; Klassengespräch; Multimediales Lernen; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Bildungspraxis; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Normwert
Abstract	This study presents an analysis of whether geometry teachers create opportunities for student discussion when engaging students in proving as revealed through the use of a multimedia survey instrument. We presented 42 secondary mathematics teachers with 8 multimedia narratives set in the situation of doing proofs in high school geometry and asked them to choose what they would do next, presenting options that included a normative instructional action which closed off discussion and less typical actions that encouraged student discussion. Our analysis provides insight into the professional obligations that teachers use to justify their departure from the norm in order to encourage student talk as well as the background variables that are associated with such decisions. We found that while secondary mathematics teachers frequently chose to promote discussion in their classrooms, the rationale that they chose for this decision and the reasons they might choose not to immediately encourage discussion differed according to the amount of experience they had teaching geometry. We use these differences to illustrate how the professional obligations can be used to better understand how teacher decisions are rationalized at the level of the instructional situation. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01