Digital Learning Hubs: Theoretical and Practical Ideas for Innovating Massive Open Online Courses

Autor/inn/en	Kucirkova, Natalia; Littleton, Karen
Titel	Digital Learning Hubs: Theoretical and Practical Ideas for Innovating Massive Open Online Courses
Quelle	In: Learning, Media and Technology, 42 (2017) 3, S.324-330 (7 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1743-9884
DOI	10.1080/17439884.2015.1054835
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Online Courses; Models; Educational Practices; Educational Methods; Learning Processes; Individualized Instruction; Educational Theories; Electronic Learning; Technology Uses in Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Online course; Online-Kurs; Analogiemodell; Bildungspraxis; Educational method; Erziehungsmethode; Learning process; Lernprozess; Individualisierender Unterricht; Educational theory; Theory of education; Bildungstheorie; Technology enhanced learning; Technology aided learning; Technologieunterstütztes Lernen
Abstract	Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are online courses aimed at global unlimited participation, originally conceptualised to carry no fee and offer no formal accreditation to the students (McAuley et al. 2010). Although their pedagogies vary, the most popular MOOC providers (e.g., Coursera, FutureLearn and EdX) are turning towards what Rodriguez (2012) described as Stanford-AI-like model, which is "essentially a digital facelift of traditional education" (cited in Mudzamba and de la Rey 2013, 6). According to Rodriguez (2012), learners on these courses are assimilating knowledge provided by the institution, with the option to obtain an honorary certificate of participation, which is graded and carries a fee. As an antidote to the Stanford-AI model, the connectivist model of MOOCs positions learners as co-creators and co-consumers of contents which are available anywhere and anytime (Kop and Hill 2008; Rodriguez 2012). However, while this model is more aligned with the notion of a transformative paradigm, it is the one that is currently characterised by low retention rates and is often described as unsustainable (Clow 2013). In this Viewpoint, the authors argue that a more refined distinction than the one proposed by the connectivist model is necessary to address the issue of student engagement and realise transformative educational visions. Digital learning hubs (DLHs) are a practical exemplification of innovative pedagogies and of a learning approach that is a reciprocal collaborative process, conceptualised as a broader distribution of expertise and collective experiences (Bransford, Brown, and Cocking 2000). DLHs harness Web 2.0 technologies for transformative educational purposes and their popularity, self-sustainability and steady growth indicate that a close emulation of their model can support critical points in the future design stages of MOOCs. If MOOCs become a more deliberately collective act of knowledge building, with a web of practices which "stretch into a complex system beginning and ending outside the school" (Nespor 1997, xiii), then learners' joint learning experiences can foster a vibrant, democratic learning community. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01