Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enKeshavarz, Mohammad H.; Ghamoushi, Masoume
TitelA Comparative Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies among Monolingual and Bilingual Iranian EFL Learners
QuelleIn: Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5 (2014) 4, S.25-32 (8 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN2203-4714
SchlagwörterComparative Analysis; Metacognition; Reading Strategies; Bilingualism; Monolingualism; Indo European Languages; English (Second Language); Second Language Learning; Second Language Instruction; Majors (Students); English Literature; Questionnaires; Undergraduate Students; Student Attitudes; Translation; Teacher Education; Self Evaluation (Individuals); Language Proficiency; Foreign Countries; Statistical Analysis; Iran
AbstractSome researchers argue that linguistic knowledge of one's native language facilitates the acquisition of additional languages (see, for example, Cenoz & Valencia, 1994; Grenfell & Harris, 2006; Hakuta, 1990; Keshavarz & Astaneh, 2004). To contribute to this line of research, the present study investigated the probability of significant differences among monolingual and bilingual EFL learners in their awareness and perceived use of metacognitive reading strategies and in the subscales of these strategies (i.e., global, supportive, and problem-solving strategies). To achieve this goal, 100 Persian monolingual and 100 Azeri Turkish-Persian bilingual second-year university students, majoring in English Literature, ELT, and Translation with the age range of 20-28 participated in the study. Both groups completed the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) questionnaire. Participants' reading strategy use was determined by asking them to rate their self-perceived reading ability in reading English course books on a 5-point Likert scale. The results of data analyses revealed significant differences between monolingual and bilingual learners in the use of "overall" and "global" metacognitive reading strategies with bilingual learners having greater awareness of these two strategies. However, no significant difference was found between monolingual and bilingual participants in the use of "problem-solving" and "supportive" metacognitive strategies. This may be due to variables such as language proficiency level and attitudes towards reading that were not taken into consideration in the present study. Based on the results, it can be concluded that bilingualism enhances learners' overall awareness and use of metacognitive reading strategies. In conclusion, the findings indicated that monolingual learners, compared to bilinguals, were less aware of global and overall metacognitive reading strategies. Therefore, EFL teachers should try to increase monolingual students' awareness of such strategies and help them become, what Pressley & Afflerbach (1995) call, "constructively responsive" readers. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenAustralian International Academic Centre PTY, LTD. 11 Souter Crescent, Footscray VIC, Australia 3011. Tel: +61-3-9028-6880; e-mail: editor.alls@aiac.org.au; Web site: http://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/alls/index
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Advances in Language and Literary Studies" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: