Deregulation and the American Education Marketplace

Autor/inn/en	Dorsey, Dana N. Thompson; Plucker, Jonathan A.
Titel	Deregulation and the American Education Marketplace
Quelle	In: Peabody Journal of Education, 91 (2016) 4, S.424-440 (17 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0161-956X
DOI	10.1080/0161956X.2016.1207431
Schlagwörter	Public Schools; Elementary Secondary Education; Politics of Education; Federal Regulation; Educational Change; Educational History; Educational Policy; School Choice; Magnet Schools; Charter Schools; Open Enrollment; Educational Vouchers; Competition; Home Schooling; Outcomes of Education; Equal Education; Economically Disadvantaged; Access to Education + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Public school; Öffentliche Schule; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Bundeskompetenz; Bildungsreform; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Politics of education; Choice of school; Schulwahl; Charter school; Charter-Schule; Open entry; Offenes Bildungssystem; Educational voucher; Bildungsgutschein; Wettkampf; Homeschooling; Home instruction; ; Hausunterricht; Heimschule; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang
Abstract	The deregulation movement has impacted the social, political, and economic landscape in the United States and continues to do so. In this article, we briefly summarize the general history of deregulation in this country and the meaning of deregulation within the specific context of education policy and reform. We focus on deregulation efforts designed to provide families and students with greater choice in where and how their K-12 schooling occurs, including magnet schools, charter schools, open-enrollment programs, and vouchers. We discuss different forms of deregulation in the K-12 education system, competition effects, and various issues related to deregulation, including potential future issues that may arise in a deregulated education marketplace. In our analysis, we conclude that education deregulation has the potential to serve some members of society, but at the detriment of others, and that a great deal of future work is needed to determine the effects-both anticipated and unintended-of deregulation in this context. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01