Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enKingpum, Peerasak; Ruangsuwan, Chaiyot; Chaicharoen, Sumalee
TitelA Development of a Collaborative Blended Learning Model to Enhance Learning Achievement and Thinking Ability of Undergraduate Students at the Institute of Physical Education
QuelleIn: Educational Research and Reviews, 10 (2015) 15, S.2168-2177 (10 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1990-3839
SchlagwörterCooperative Learning; Blended Learning; Undergraduate Students; Physical Education; Thinking Skills; Models; Educational Objectives; Educational Principles; Teaching Methods; Learning Activities; Student Evaluation; Measurement Techniques; Experimental Groups; Control Groups; Comparative Analysis; Foreign Countries; Technology Uses in Education; Conventional Instruction; Student Surveys; Questionnaires; Pretests Posttests; Thailand
AbstractThis research aimed to develop a model of a collaborative blended learning (CoBl) to develop learning achievement and thinking ability of undergraduate students in the Institute of Physical Education. The research is divided into three phases using the blended learning model via collaborative learning with thinking abilities approach as follows: Phase 1 consists of the development of the collaborative blended learning model; phase 2, the effects of implementing from the model to develop thinking abilities; phase 3, the presentation of the developed model to a group of experts for accepting the developed model. The findings showed that: there are four components in the model of collaborative blended learning namely principles, objectives, procedures and instructional activities, and measurement and evaluation. The instructional processes are divided into 3 phases, namely, preparation, learning management, and measurement and evaluation. The experimental group of students showed gains in learning achievement and thinking abilities as a whole and in each subscale from before learning with the developed model at the 0.05 level of significance. They showed greater learning achievement than the control group of students (p = 0.001). However, the two groups of these students did not statistically indicate different thinking abilities (p = 0.501). In addition, the students showed their opinions about learning with the developed model at the high agreed level. Also, the experts assessed the developed model at the most appropriate level. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenAcademic Journals. e-mail: err@academic.journals.org; e-mail: service@academicjournals.org; Web site: http://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2020/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Educational Research and Reviews" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: